£45,000 Internet Fraud: Court Summons Correctional Services Officer Over Disappearance Of Defendant

0
593
Court


By; BAYO AKAMO, Ibadan


A Federal High Court sitting in Ibadan, Oyo State, has subpoenaed an officer of the Nigerian Correctional Service, Deputy Superintendent of the Correction (DSC) J.O. Oyaleke over his failure to produce in court, a defendant identified as Otuyalo Oluwadamilola.
The defendant is being prosecuted  by the Ibadan Zonal Command of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, and remanded by the court for his involvement in cybercrimes to the tune of £45,000 (Forty-Five Thousand Pounds Sterling).
The NCS Deputy Superintendent was served with the “summon” on February 25, 2022 to come and testify about the whereabouts of the defendant. 
DSC Oyaleke who is attached to Justice Uche Agomoh’s court was charged with the responsibility of producing any defendant remanded by same court failed to produce the defendant on the 2nd of December, 2021  which had been slated for commencement of trial.
When asked by the court about the whereabouts of the defendant, Oyaleke told the court that the defendant was amongst the 401 inmates who fled Abolongo Correctional facility on October 22, 2021 during an attack by some bandits.
DSC Oyaleke further told the court that the Oyo State office of the Nigerian Correctional Service is working with relevant agencies to ensure the re-arrest of the fleeing defendant.
Justice Agomoh however, adjourned the matter till June 29, 2022, for mention.

New Nigerian recalled that thedefendant was arraigned  last year on five-count charge for internet fraud and he pleaded “not guilty” to the charges preferred against him by the EFCC.
One of the counts reads: “That you, Otuyalo Oluwadamilola, between August, 2017 to September, 2017 within the jurisdiction of this Honourable Court took possession of the aggregate sum of N16, 638, 000.00 (Sixteen Million, Six Hundred and Thirty-eight Thousand Naira Only) paid into your account with Zenith Bank Plc-1005137906 under the disguise that the said sum was for a business transaction when you reasonably ought to have known that the said fund formed part of the proceeds of an unlawful activity, to wit: Internet Fraud, and hereby committed an offence contrary to Section 15 (2) (d) of the Money Laundering (Prohibition) Act, 2011 as amended and punishable under Section 15 (3) of the same Act.”
ENDS.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here